Facts of the Case:

In a case involving a Habeas Corpus petition, a girl was produced before the court by from Police Station Mrigwas, District Guna. She informed the court that she had been taken by X (the abductor) and expressed her wish to return to her parents, rejecting the idea of going anywhere else. The State’s counsel confirmed that a case had been registered against the abductors and assured the court of appropriate legal action.

Court’s Observation:

The court observed that while the girl had been recovered and desired to return to her parents, incidents of this nature often leave deep psychological and emotional scars on victims. The court highlighted that such victims, whether of sexual offenses or other distressing circumstances, often suffer from trauma and require more than just physical protection. They need guidance, encouragement, and mentorship to help them rebuild their lives. The court pointed out that parents are sometimes ill-equipped to provide this support due to illiteracy, the pressures of daily survival, or their own trauma from the incident. The phenomenon of Stockholm Syndrome, where victims may develop sympathetic feelings towards their captors, was also discussed, emphasizing the complex psychological state these victims can be in.

To address these needs, the court introduced the concept of “Shaurya Didi,” a female mentor who could be a Sub-Inspector, Constable, or another suitable person under the Juvenile Justice Act. This mentor would provide continuous guidance and support to the victim, encouraging them to pursue education or vocational training and integrating them back into a constructive and meaningful life. In this case, the court appointed a Shaurya Didi for the girl. She was tasked with guiding and mentoring the girl, maintaining regular contact, and visiting her once a week over the next six months. She was also instructed to submit a report on her experience and the girl’s progress after this period.

The Court further observed that “This is a concept which requires evolution by the policy makers to address the plight of victims of sexual offences as well as Child in Need of Care and Protection and at times for Child in Conflict with Law also. Concerned departments may think over framing Statutes/Rules/Guidelines in detail in this regard.”

Court’s Decision:

The court concluded that since the girl wished to return to her parents, there was no reason to keep the petition pending, and it was thus disposed of as infructuous. The girl was allowed to leave with her parents following due verification.

Written by Deeksha Rai